KPV's file has an unusual centre of gravity. There are 48 indexed papers, a clean mechanism and a decade and a half of serious work — and the largest single group of those papers is not about what the compound does. It is about how to get it to the tissue at all.
This page reports what the sources state and does not recommend anything. Our page on the questions we ask of any dosage figure sets out what separates a label figure from a convention. How brands appear on this site is set out on our disclosure page.
What the molecule is
KPV is lysine-proline-valine: three amino acids, and specifically the last three residues of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone — written in the literature as alpha-MSH(11-13).
The research premise, examined directly in a 2003 paper in the Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics that set out to dissect the anti-inflammatory effect of the core and C-terminal regions, is that this fragment carries much of the parent hormone's anti-inflammatory activity without its pigmentation effects. That is why a tripeptide has a literature at all.
What does not exist
- DailyMed: zero records on 2026-09-11. No approved product, so no labelled dose, route or maximum.
- ClinicalTrials.gov: no studies. No protocol or results record exists for any human administration.
- PubMed randomised-controlled-trial filter: zero.
Classifying all 48
A title-and-abstract search returned 66 records for KPV[tiab] and 48 once restricted to a peptide, tripeptide, colitis, inflammation or alpha-MSH context — the rest are unrelated abbreviation collisions in stress-physiology and receptor papers. We retrieved and read all 48.
| Group | Approx. count | What they are |
|---|---|---|
| Drug-delivery engineering | 14 | Hyaluronic-acid nanoparticles, mucoadhesive and double-network hydrogels, temperature-sensitive gels, transdermal iontophoresis, film dressings, PepT1-targeted nanodrugs, self-immolative oral conjugates |
| alpha-MSH biology and reviews | 12 | The parent hormone's immune role, melanocortin-system reviews, tripeptide biochemistry |
| Gut and colitis models | 8 | Murine colitis, PepT1 uptake, colitis-associated cancer, mucosal barrier restoration |
| Skin, wound and cornea | 7 | Corneal epithelial wound healing, keratinocyte studies, diabetic wound dressings, tripeptide wound-healing reviews |
| Immune and cellular mechanism | 5 | Basophil activation, bronchial epithelial cells, candidacidal activity, TNF-alpha signalling |
| Chemistry and analysis | 2 | Structural modification by glycoalkylation, a stability-indicating HPLC assay |
| Registered human trials | 0 | — |
There is more published work on how to deliver KPV than on what any quantity of it does. That is not a rhetorical framing; it is what reading 48 titles produces.
Why delivery dominates
The reason is in the file's mechanistic anchor. A 2008 Gastroenterology paper reported that KPV is taken up through PepT1, the intestinal peptide transporter, and that this uptake reduces intestinal inflammation. Once the effect depends on a specific transporter in a specific tissue, the route of administration stops being an implementation detail and becomes the experiment.
Everything downstream follows from that. The 2010 Gastroenterology paper used drug-loaded nanoparticles in a polysaccharide hydrogel targeted to the colon. The 2017 Molecular Therapy paper used hyaluronic-acid-functionalised nanoparticles for oral delivery. The 2022 Acta Biomaterialia paper built a KPV-binding double-network hydrogel to restore the gut mucosal barrier. A 2026 paper in Science Advances describes inflammation-triggered self-immolative conjugates specifically to overcome gastrointestinal barriers to oral peptide delivery.
A stated quantity with no vehicle attached omits the variable that most of this literature exists to solve.
The 36 "human" records, and what they actually are
PubMed's humans MeSH term matches 36 of the KPV records, which is the number most likely to be misread. Reading them shows what they are: human keratinocytes, human bronchial epithelial cells, human basophils, microporated human skin in a diffusion cell, human cell lines.
A humans tag marks human-derived material, not human administration. The randomised-trial filter returning zero, and the registry holding no study, is the check that settles it.
What the sources state as a quantity
| Figure stated | Route | Where it comes from |
|---|---|---|
| 250–500 µg per day | Subcutaneous | Vendor and protocol pages; no stated origin |
| ~500 µg to 1 mg per day | Oral capsule | Vendor pages; no stated origin |
| 0.5–1% preparations | Topical | Compounding and vendor pages; no stated origin |
No source we located states where any of these came from, and none names a study. Given that the published work is dominated by engineered vehicles, a figure quoted for a plain solution or a plain capsule is describing a preparation the literature has largely not tested.
The arithmetic, if a figure is being converted
A 5 mg vial in 2 mL of bacteriostatic water gives 2.5 mg/mL. A stated 500 µg is 0.2 mL — 20 units on a U-100 insulin syringe. The same vial in 1 mL gives 5 mg/mL and halves that to 10 units.
Our reconstitution page carries the arithmetic for other vial-and-volume combinations, and our guide to the U-100 unit scale covers what the unit markings mean.
What is not established
- No approved label anywhere, so no dose has been reviewed by a regulator.
- No trial registration anywhere, so no human protocol or result exists to check a claim against.
- No randomised trial in the indexed literature.
- No stated origin for any circulating figure, in any of the three routes.
- The animal evidence is a mouse gut model. Induced murine colitis appears across the 2008, 2010, 2016, 2022 and 2024 papers. It is a coherent model and it is a mouse.
- The delivery question is open in the literature itself. Researchers were still publishing new vehicles in 2026 to get the tripeptide past the gastrointestinal tract, which is a direct statement that the simple routes are not solved.
What a reader can check in five minutes
- Search DailyMed for
KPV— zero records. - Search ClinicalTrials.gov for KPV — no studies.
- Run
KPV[tiab]in PubMed, then addAND randomized controlled trial[pt]and watch it return nothing. - Read the 48 titles and count how many name a hydrogel, a nanoparticle or a delivery system.
- Check whether any figure on a vendor page states which vehicle it applies to.
Related on this site
KPV is also the fourth peptide in the premixed blend covered on what a KLOW vial's ratio means for each component. Our BPC-157 page reports the same evidence shape for a different gut-associated peptide — strong rodent model, no registered human trial. How to read a dosing claim sets out the checks that catch an untraceable figure, and our page on reading a certificate of analysis covers what a research-market document establishes about what is in a vial.
Sources and dates
Opened 2026-09-11: the DailyMed SPL search API for KPV peptide (zero records); the ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API for KPV (no studies); PubMed through the NCBI E-utilities for KPV[tiab] (66 records), for KPV[tiab] AND (peptide[tiab] OR tripeptide[tiab] OR colitis[tiab] OR inflammation[tiab] OR "alpha-MSH"[tiab]) (48 records), for the same query with the humans MeSH term (36 records) and with the randomised-controlled-trial publication type (zero), with all 48 summaries retrieved and classified by hand into the groups in the table above. Papers named in the text — the 2003 Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics dissection of the core and C-terminal fragments, the 2008 Gastroenterology PepT1 paper, the 2010 Gastroenterology colon-targeted nanoparticle paper, the 2017 Molecular Therapy hyaluronic-acid nanoparticle paper, the 2022 Acta Biomaterialia hydrogel paper and the 2026 Science Advances self-immolative conjugate paper — are all in that retrieved record set. Corrections go to the contact page.
