Peptifact

AICAR Dosage: 1,536 People Received It in the Largest Trial, All by Seven-Hour Intravenous Infusion, and the Result Was a Tie

AICAR's human dose record is an intravenous one. The phase 3 RED-CABG trial gave 1,536 cardiac surgery patients 42 milligrams per kilogram as a seven-hour infusion and reported a primary event rate identical to saline. The only trial to push the dose higher was terminated for renal toxicity.

Robert F · Edited by Caroline S · Published 2026-09-21

Illustration: An intravenous drip set, partially disassembled and empty, on a sterile, cool grey surface.
Illustration

AICAR has more human dose data than almost anything else in this catalogue — one phase 3 trial, over a thousand people dosed, posted results. It is worth reading precisely, because the headline number usually quoted about it is roughly double the truth, and the outcome is usually not quoted at all.

It is not a peptide

AICAR — acadesine, AICA riboside — is a nucleoside analogue and an activator of AMP-activated protein kinase. It is recorded here for the same reason as SLU-PP-332 and 5-amino-1MQ: it is sold in the same market, beside the same compounds, to the same buyers.

The largest trial, and the number that gets misquoted

NCT00872001 — RED-CABG. Sponsor Merck Sharp & Dohme. Phase 3, high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. April 2009 to October 2010. Terminated.

Acadesine Placebo (normal saline)
Started 1,536 1,544
Completed 1,400 1,413
Did not complete 136 131

Enrolled: 3,080. Dosed with acadesine: 1,536.

This site's own keyword map carried the figure "over 3,100 people dosed". That counts the randomised total, and about half of it received saline. The correction matters beyond one row: in a placebo-controlled trial, enrolment and exposure are different numbers, and the registry publishes both.

The dose

Amount 42 mg/kg
Dilution Into 500 mL normal saline
Route Intravenous infusion
Duration ≈ 7 hours
Rate 0.1 mg/kg/min (1.2 mL/min of the 500 mL bag)
Start Within ≈ 30 min before induction of anaesthesia
Plus 5 μg/mL added to the cardioplegia solution

For an 80 kg adult that is 3,360 mg in a single administration, dripped in over seven hours, in an operating theatre, with a second dose route through the solution used to arrest the heart.

The comparison worth making is with the unit the compound is sold in. A typical research-market vial or capsule is 50 mg. The trial dose is more than sixty times that, and it is not given as a bolus — the seven-hour infusion at a fixed rate per kilogram per minute is part of the specification, not a convenience of the surgical setting.

The result

Posted results, primary composite — all-cause death, non-fatal stroke, or need for mechanical support for severe left ventricular dysfunction, through post-operative day 28:

Outcome Acadesine Placebo
Primary composite (all-cause death version) 4.9% 4.9%
Composite with cardiovascular death 4.8% 4.7%
Component 1.7% 1.6%
Component 1.7% 1.7%
Component 2.2% 2.3%

Identical on the primary endpoint, and within a rounding place of each other on every other posted measure. The trial was terminated.

This is a rare thing in this catalogue and it should be said plainly: the compound was tested properly, at scale, against placebo, with results posted — and it did not separate from saline. Most compounds here have no such test. AICAR's problem is not an absence of evidence.

The only attempt to go higher stopped for toxicity

NCT01813838 — GFM-Acadesine. Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies. Phase 1/2 in high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, acute myeloid leukaemia with 20–30% marrow blasts, and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia type 2 not responding to azacitidine or decitabine.

The design was a classic escalation: three patients at 140 mg/kg/day, then three more at 210, then 315, with expansion cohorts on any toxicity signal.

It is recorded as terminated with 5 participants actually enrolled, and the registry's why-stopped field reads:

Renal toxicity

That is the entire upper end of this compound's human dose range, and it is a stopping point rather than a ceiling. Nothing in the record describes a dose above 42 mg/kg that was given to a meaningful number of people without a problem.

What the rest of the registry holds

Study n Setting
NCT00559624 40 (estimated) B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, open-label dose escalation, 4-hour IV infusions
NCT00004314 2 Phase 2 pilot, AICA-ribosiduria
NCT06845501 10 (recruiting) Purine supplementation in AICA-ribosiduria

A search for acadesine returns 4 records; a search for AICAR returns 6, and most of those use the term for a laboratory reagent or a metabolic pathway rather than an administered drug — sunitinib and atrial trabeculae contractility, pemetrexed in lung cancer, inflammation and obesity.

Every registered human administration found here is intravenous. No registered trial gave the compound by subcutaneous injection, and none gave it by mouth at a dose intended to produce a systemic effect. The oral and injectable products sold in this market have no human route precedent at all.

Banned, and null, at the same time

AICAR is on the World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List as a metabolic modulator, on the strength of preclinical work suggesting that AMP-activated protein kinase activation could produce endurance adaptations without training.

Both facts are accurate and they are not in tension: a compound can be prohibited on the basis of a plausible mechanism in animals while its one large human trial, in a different indication, returns a result identical to saline. A ban is a statement about intent and plausibility. A phase 3 result is a measurement.

Method

The ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API was queried on 21 September 2026 for AICAR and acadesine, and each administering record was opened individually — including its results section, its enrolment type and its why-stopped field — rather than read from a result list. Participant-flow figures are taken from the posted results of NCT00872001 and are quoted as started and completed per arm, not as enrolment. Dose text is quoted from the intervention descriptions of the records themselves. Related records: the dosage chart grades every compound here by the tier of source behind its figure, how to read a dosing claim sets out why an infusion dose and a vial are not the same kind of number, and research use only explained covers what the label on a research-market product does and does not assert. Nothing on this page is a dosing instruction.

Frequently asked questions

What is the dose of AICAR?

The human dose record is intravenous and large. The phase 3 RED-CABG trial gave 42 milligrams per kilogram, diluted to 500 millilitres and infused over approximately seven hours at 0.1 milligrams per kilogram per minute, beginning shortly before anaesthesia for cardiac surgery. A phase 1/2 haematology trial escalated to 140, 210 and 315 milligrams per kilogram per day and was stopped for renal toxicity after five patients. For an 80 kilogram adult the RED-CABG dose is 3,360 milligrams in one administration. This site reports those figures as record and none of them as guidance.

How many people have received AICAR in a trial?

Fewer than the commonly quoted figure, and the difference is a randomisation detail rather than a rounding one. RED-CABG enrolled 3,080 participants, but 1,536 were assigned to acadesine and 1,544 to normal saline, so about half of the headline number received a placebo. Adding the smaller registered studies, a phase 1/2 haematology trial that stopped at 5 participants and a 2-participant pilot in AICA-ribosiduria, the defensible count of people who actually received the compound in registered trials is a little over 1,540, not over 3,100.

Did AICAR work in its largest trial?

The posted results show no separation at all. The primary composite of all-cause death, non-fatal stroke or need for mechanical support for severe left ventricular dysfunction through day 28 was 4.9 percent in both arms. The cardiovascular-death version was 4.8 against 4.7 percent, and the three individual components were 1.7 against 1.6, 1.7 against 1.7, and 2.2 against 2.3. The trial was terminated. A drug given to 1,536 people by seven-hour infusion produced an event rate indistinguishable from saline.

Is AICAR taken orally?

Not in any registered trial found in this site's sources. Every human administration on the registry is intravenous, by infusion over hours, in a hospital setting with the dose diluted into a 500 millilitre bag. The compound's reputation in the fitness market rests on preclinical work in mice, and the route those animals received it by is not the route a capsule provides. The absence of an oral human study is a fact about the record and not an inference from it.

What is the highest dose ever given, and what happened?

The Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies ran a phase 1/2 dose-escalation in myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia, designed to start three patients at 140 milligrams per kilogram per day and rise through 210 to 315 if no toxicity appeared. The registry records the trial as terminated with 5 participants actually enrolled, and its why-stopped field reads, in full, renal toxicity. That is the only registered attempt to push this compound's dose, and it is the reason the upper end of its human range is a stopping point rather than a ceiling.

Why is a non-peptide in a peptide dosage catalogue?

Because it is sold in the same places, to the same buyers, listed beside the same compounds. AICAR is a nucleoside analogue that activates AMP-activated protein kinase, and it is not a peptide in any sense. This site records it for the same reason it records the other non-peptides in this cluster: the question a reader arrives with is about the vial in front of them, and declining to answer it because of a classification would leave the dose record unwritten.

Is AICAR banned in sport?

Yes. AICAR is prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency as a metabolic modulator, and its inclusion followed the preclinical work suggesting AMP-activated protein kinase activation could produce endurance adaptations without training. The regulatory status and the clinical evidence point in different directions and both are accurate: a compound can be banned on the basis of a plausible performance mechanism while its largest human trial, in a different indication, returns a null result.