Peptifact

Adipotide Dosage: The Human Starting Dose Is in the Public Record, and It Is a Fourteenth of the Monkey Dose Everyone Quotes

One human trial of adipotide was ever registered. It gives a starting dose of 0.03 mg/kg subcutaneously daily for 28 days, enrolled four patients in six and a half years, was terminated at the investigator's request, and posted no results. The figure the market quotes comes from rhesus macaques.

Robert F · Edited by Caroline S · Published 2026-09-19

Illustration: Four small clear glass vials with minuscule amounts of white powder on a slate-grey surface.
Illustration

Adipotide is unusual in this catalogue for having a human dose in the public record that almost nobody quotes, and a monkey dose that almost everybody does.

Both figures are real and correctly reported in their sources. They differ by a factor of about fourteen.

What the compound is

Adipotide is a peptidomimetic with the sequence CKGGRAKDC-GG-(D)(KLAKLAK)2: a targeting sequence that binds a receptor on the blood vessels serving white fat, joined to a pro-apoptotic sequence that kills the cell it is delivered to. The design intent is vascular — destroy the blood supply to fat tissue — rather than metabolic or appetite-mediated. That distinction matters later, because it is the part of the story the published literature argues about.

The one human record

Exactly one human trial has ever been registered, and it is not filed under the name the market uses. A ClinicalTrials.gov search for adipotide returns zero records. The trial is:

NCT01262664A First-in-Man, Phase I Evaluation of A Single Cycle of Prohibitin Targeting Peptide 1 in Patients With Metastatic Prostate Cancer and Obesity, sponsored by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.

Field Registry value
Intervention Starting dose of 0.03 mg/kg, injection under the skin, once each day, for 28 days
Phase 1
Design Single group, open label, treatment
Condition Prostate cancer
First posted 17 December 2010
Start date 24 May 2012 (actual)
Completion 2 January 2019 (actual)
Enrolment 4 (actual)
Status TERMINATED — "Terminated per PI's request"
Results posted None

Four patients over six and a half years, terminated, no results. That is the entire human record for this compound, and the 0.03 mg/kg daily for 28 days in the intervention field is the only human dose figure in it.

It is reported here as what the registry states — a Phase 1 starting dose, in men with metastatic prostate cancer and obesity, in a trial that did not complete. Nothing on this page is a recommendation.

The figure everyone actually quotes

The number on retail and forum pages is 0.43 mg/kg, and it has a real source: the 2011 Science Translational Medicine paper that put the compound on the map, A peptidomimetic targeting white fat causes weight loss and improved insulin resistance in obese monkeys.

That paper identifies 0.43 mg/kg given subcutaneously daily for 28 days as the optimal therapeutic dose in spontaneously obese rhesus macaques, and reports 0.25 mg/kg and 0.75 mg/kg groups alongside it.

Set the two records side by side:

Registered human trial Monkey study
Dose 0.03 mg/kg/day 0.43 mg/kg/day (optimal)
Route Subcutaneous Subcutaneous
Duration 28 days 28 days
Species Human Rhesus macaque, plus two other species
Result None posted Weight loss, improved insulin resistance

Same route, same schedule, a fourteen-fold difference in the dose, and only one of them measured in people. A Phase 1 starting dose is deliberately set well below the anticipated therapeutic level, so the gap is exactly what a first-in-man design would produce — which is the point. The monkey number is not the human number, and the trial designed to find the human number stopped after four patients.

What the monkey study also found

The part of that paper least often carried forward is in its own abstract: at experimentally determined optimal doses, monkeys from three different species displayed predictable and reversible changes in renal proximal tubule function.

The body of the paper is more specific. It describes the primary side effect as relatively mild, predictable and reversible renal injury and altered tubular function; reports slight-to-moderate dose-dependent elevations in serum creatinine during subcutaneous administration above a threshold dose; and notes that after the predetermined recovery period, one treated monkey in each study still showed a slight residual elevation in serum creatinine and urinary glucose. Separately, it reports that single doses up to 100 mg/kg — described as roughly 133-fold the corresponding therapeutic dose — did not result in lethality.

These are kidney effects observed at the dose that worked, not at an overdose. A page that quotes 0.43 mg/kg as the adipotide dose and omits this is quoting half of one sentence from a study it has not read past the abstract.

The mechanism is disputed in the literature

In April 2012 the same journal published a formal Comment on the monkey paper. Its argument, in the words of its own abstract: the reported effect "may instead reflect a direct effect of adipotide on food consumption."

That is a substantive disagreement about what the compound does, published in the same venue, seven months after the original. It does not establish that the Comment is right. It does establish that the fat-vasculature mechanism presented as settled fact on retail pages has been contested in the primary literature since 2012 and never resolved, because the human programme that would have resolved it enrolled four people.

The size of the evidence file, and a counting trap

A PubMed search for adipotide on 19 September 2026 returns seven records. Only four are about the compound:

Record What it is
2011, Sci Transl Med The rhesus macaque study
2012, Sci Transl Med The Comment on it
2012, Diabetes Glucose tolerance in obese mice, weight- and food-intake-independent
2013, J Control Release A comparison of nanoparticle-targeted and bioconjugate approaches

The other three — a study of the GPER-selective agonist G-1, a paper on epigenetic age acceleration in adolescence, and a trial of metformin's effect on GLP-1 levels — have nothing to do with adipotide and are artefacts of PubMed's term mapping.

This is the same trap this site recorded in the FDA Drug Master File list on 18 September, where a substring search for BPC returned nine rows and not one was BPC-157. A search count is not an evidence count until the rows have been read individually. Four papers, one of which disputes another, and one terminated trial: that is the file.

Where this leaves the compound

Adipotide has no approved product anywhere, no label, no posted human result, a contested mechanism, a documented renal signal at its effective animal dose, and a development programme that stopped. Its most-quoted dose figure is from macaques; its only human figure is a starting dose from a trial that enrolled four people.

For how this catalogue grades figures of this kind, see how to read a dosing claim; the full index of what has been opened for each compound is the peptide dosage chart. The general point that the human record for these compounds is usually smaller than the search volume implies is covered in peptide side effects.

Sources

  • ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01262664, full protocol section via API v2. Identification, status, design, arms and interventions modules. Read 19 September 2026.
  • ClinicalTrials.gov term queries "adipotide" and "prohibitin targeting" (1 record total). Read 19 September 2026.
  • Barnhart KF et al. A peptidomimetic targeting white fat causes weight loss and improved insulin resistance in obese monkeys. Sci Transl Med, 9 November 2011. DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002621. Full text via PMC3666164; abstract, dose-finding and renal sections. Read 19 September 2026.
  • Comment on "A peptidomimetic targeting white fat causes weight loss and improved insulin resistance in obese monkeys". Sci Transl Med, 25 April 2012. DOI 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003760. Read 19 September 2026.
  • PubMed E-utilities search for "adipotide", 7 records, each summary read individually. Read 19 September 2026.

Frequently asked questions

What is the human dose of adipotide?

The only figure in a registered human record is a starting dose of 0.03 mg/kg, injected under the skin once each day for 28 days, from NCT01262664 at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. It is a Phase 1 starting dose in men with metastatic prostate cancer and obesity, in a trial that enrolled four patients, was terminated at the principal investigator's request and posted no results. It is reported here as what the registry states. It is not an established dose, and it is not a recommendation.

Why do retail pages quote 0.43 mg/kg?

Because that is the monkey figure, and it is the one that was published in a headline journal. The 2011 Science Translational Medicine paper identifies 0.43 mg/kg subcutaneously daily for 28 days as the optimal therapeutic dose in spontaneously obese rhesus macaques. It is a real, sourced, correctly quoted number — about a species other than ours. The registered human starting dose is roughly one fourteenth of it, over the same 28 days and by the same route.

Why does a registry search for 'adipotide' return nothing?

Because the trial is filed under the development name. NCT01262664 is titled around Prohibitin Targeting Peptide 1, and searching the registry for 'adipotide' returns zero records while searching for the development code returns the trial immediately. This is a general trap rather than a quirk of this compound: registry and literature searches are indexed on the name the sponsor used, which is frequently not the name the market uses.

Why was the adipotide trial terminated?

The registry's reason field says only 'Terminated per PI's request', which is not an explanation. What the surrounding fields show is that the study was first posted in December 2010, started in May 2012, ran until January 2019, and enrolled four patients in that time against a Phase 1 design. Six and a half years for four patients describes an enrolment failure whatever the stated reason, and no results were ever posted. The honest summary is that the human programme did not produce a readable result rather than that it produced a negative one.

What did the monkey study find about safety?

Its own abstract states that at experimentally determined optimal doses, monkeys from three different species displayed predictable and reversible changes in renal proximal tubule function. The paper describes the primary side effect as relatively mild, predictable and reversible renal injury with altered tubular function and dose-dependent elevations in serum creatinine, and notes that after the recovery period one treated monkey in each study still showed slight residual elevation in serum creatinine and urinary glucose. Separately it reports that single doses up to 100 mg/kg, about 133-fold the therapeutic dose, were not lethal. Kidney effects at the effective dose are a finding of the study, not an artefact of overdosing.

Is the weight-loss mechanism established?

It is contested in the published record. The 2011 paper attributes the weight loss to targeted apoptosis in the blood vessels of white adipose tissue. The following year the same journal published a Comment arguing that the result may instead reflect a direct effect of the compound on food consumption. A mechanism that is disputed in the literature at this level does not support the mechanistic claims made for the compound on retail pages, which typically present the fat-vasculature explanation as settled.

How much research exists on adipotide?

Very little, and less than a raw count suggests. A PubMed search on 19 September 2026 returns seven records, but only four are about the compound — the 2011 monkey paper, the 2012 Comment on it, a 2012 mouse study of glucose tolerance, and a 2013 comparison of delivery approaches. The remaining three are term-mapping artefacts about unrelated subjects. Registered trials: one, terminated, with no results. This is one of the smallest evidence files of any compound in this catalogue.